|
Carrying Capacity Network Action Alert
Pushing
for an Immigration
Moratorium Now
Creates
an Unparalleled Opportunity to Stop Amnesty and Social Security
for Illegal Aliens this Fall, and to get Real Reductions
in Immigration This Session.
Immigration Reduction Bill Introduced
with Major, but Correctable, Flaws
|
 |
November
2005
The headlines leave little doubt -- illegal immigration has become
a hot button issue as the U.S. population and Congress register
their concern about massive in-flows of aliens. Americans dealing
with traffic gridlock, overcrowded schools, job loss and a myriad
of other problems caused by mass immigration have had enough and
are demanding change.
CCN has amply documented the intimate causal relation between
legal and illegal immigration (See CCN Action Alert, June 2004).
The facts show that legal immigrants facilitate illegal migration
by acting as magnets that draw illegal family members and friends
across the border and provide "Safe Harbor" for them
once they arrive.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT, TO HAVE ANY HOPE OF REDUCING ILLEGAL
IMMIGRATION, REDUCTIONISTS MUST PUSH FOR A MORATORIUM ON LEGAL
NUMBERS. HR 3700, The Reducing Immigration to a Genuinely Healthy
Total Act of 2005 (The RIGHT Act) just introduced in Congress
offers an opportunity, via an amendment to correct flaws and convert
it into a moratorium bill, to do just that.
The climate is right for a serious push for a moratorium on immigration.
Why a Moratorium?
Only a comprehensive moratorium bill puts the open borders lobby
on defense, making them attempt to justify the whole enterprise
of mass immigration.
· It is essential to push for a moratorium in order to
pressure Congress to lower the numbers significantly and to unambiguously
reject proposed amnesties.
· Experience from the past three decades shows that pushing
only for a reduction in some categories allows the open borders
lobby to get increases rather than decreases in legal -- and thus
illegal -- immigration. From experience, we know that a category
approach is counter-productive.
· On the contrary, a moratorium approach forces advocates
to work within a limit, would shift the argument to the costs
and benefits of particular categories and would drive reductions
in some of them. Advocating a moratorium calls the whole enterprise
of mass immigration into question.
· Lowering the level of legal immigration would also lower
the level of illegal immigration to the U.S., by dramatically
reducing the family "magnet" and "safe harbor"
effects that draw illegals over the border to join established
family members and friends.
· A moratorium would help the 15 million Americans who
are unemployed by closing the spigot that floods the labor pool.
The loss of an estimated additional 400,000 jobs due to Hurricane
Katrina makes the need for a moratorium all the more urgent.
· A return to a level of immigration which would, for
the first time in decades, put the U.S. on a path toward population
stabilization is the first, necessary step toward environmental
and economic sustainability.
National Security
A moratorium would ease the strain on the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). The DHS encompasses both Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA). Currently, the backlog of unprocessed applications for
U.S. citizenship is in the millions. A moratorium would give the
DHS a chance to catch up with the backlog, to better weed out
terrorists, criminals, and fraudulent immigrant applications.
A bill just introduced in Congress has the potential to be strengthened
and bring about reductions in immigration. HR 3700, The Reducing
Immigration to a Genuinely Healthy Total Act of 2005 (The RIGHT
Act), was introduced September 8, 2005 by Congressman Tom Tancredo.
The RIGHT Act incorporates some good concepts. It would partially
close several serious loopholes in immigration law. It would sunset
provisions of existing laws which facilitate immigration, would
require employers to sign affidavits against employment based
immigrants becoming a public charge, and would revoke citizenship
of persons who vote in foreign elections. Additionally, the bill
seeks to reduce the categories of family-sponsored immigrants
and diversity immigrants to zero.
While the intent of the bill is positive, it appears to adopt
a counter-productive uncapped category approach to immigration
reduction -- an approach that, for three decades, has proven entirely
ineffective in bringing about reductions.
Specifically, the bill's serious flaws stem from the fact that
it creates a new unlimited category of de facto immigrants which
might be called the "Green Card Holder Family Legalization
Category"!
Permanent residence through "indefinitely" renewable
visas is made available for ANY spouse and natural or adopted
children of a U.S. Citizen, or of any other Legal Permanent Residents
-- LPRs -- (e.g. Green Card Holder)!! That is, green card holders
would get the same privilege as citizens in terms of bringing
in family members PERMANENTLY.
Consider that there are over ten million non-citizen Lawful Permanent
Residents (e.g. Green Card Holders) already in the United States
(according to the 2005 Current Population Survey of the U.S. Census
Bureau) and that over one million new green cards are issued annually!
Why, we ask, should Green Card Holders, (who have made no commitment
to the United States via obtaining citizenship) have the RIGHT
to make any person they choose (including Illegal aliens) a de
facto permanent resident (i.e. immigrant) of the U.S., merely
by marrying him or her? And what is the justification for allowing
their spouses and minor children to stay permanently, becoming
de facto immigrants through the device of "indefinitely renewable"
visas?! And why should the children of LPRs and illegal aliens
have automatic birthright
citizenship, which this bill would give them?
The potential for an increase in the number of de facto immigrants
via this LEGALIZED CHAIN MIGRATION
PROVISION is huge . . . upwards of several million.
Further, consider that annually, an estimated 250,000 spouses
and minor children of U.S. citizens would be allowed defacto permanent
resident visas, AND ALSO the hundreds of thousands of spouses
and minor children as well as parents of ALL LEGAL PERMANENT RESIDENTS
would get "indefinitely renewable" permanent resident
visas. That is, they would be immigrants-in-fact.
Folks, if we think we have seen pressure to marry U.S. citizens
in order to get permanent resident status, we ain't seen nothing
yet. If this bill passes in its present form, permanent legal
residents (LPRs) will also become tickets into the United States.
The marriage business will boom and, with it, immigration.
That is why it must be amended to provide a moratorium on all
immigration (including de facto immigrant LPRs and "indefinitely
renewable" visa holders) in excess of 100,000 per year, i.e.
to cap those otherwise uncapped categories.
Near the beginning of his Congressional tenure, Congressman Tancredo,
for whom we have never had greater respect, said:
"And you have to talk about a Moratorium. Talking about
anything less than a Moratorium will never get you one step closer
to stabilization . . ."
He said this to a packed audience at a CCN/ASAP Coalition -sponsored
conference in Breckenridge, Colorado, on August 9, 1999.
Alas, it appears that the Congressman, under great pressure from
one of the NeoCon Mass Immigration Management (aka Reform Lite)
groups -- who have been previously and widely identified -- has
backed off from his pro-moratorium stance. This only demonstrates
the pernicious influence of the mass immigration management groups.
(See www.unfairus.org for more info about these groups)
Most grassroots activist leaders have told us they would not
be content to support mere category adjustments (i.e. immigration
management). After reviewing the history of those attempts that
not only failed, but created opportunities to increase immigration
rather than decrease it, real reform advocates feel "once
burned, twice shy."
Specifically, the fact that passage of this bill as written would
send the numbers of de facto immigrants skyrocketing, and the
fact that that is at variance with Rep. Tancredo's stated position
for a moratorium leads to a clear conclusion: Congressman Tancredo
was very poorly advised by those who assisted him in drafting
this legislation.
We believe this courageous and dedicated congressman was too
busy fighting for reductions in many media venues to realize that
the NeoCon bill-drafting advisors put one over on him. That sad
conclusion is hard to escape. The NUMBERS implications of this
bill have the imprimatur of a NeoCon Mass Immigration Management
Group written all over them. By the way, the provisions of the
bill are quite consistent with the president of Numbers USA's
distinct and publicly expressed disinclination to support any
significant deportations of illegal aliens. And just hours after
it was introduced, Numbers USA announced its unqualified support
in a meticulously drafted news release which reflected a thorough
knowledge of the bill.
Just remember that the NeoCon category approach implicit in this
bill has not only NOT BROUGHT ABOUT ONE SINGLE REDUCTION IN IMMIGRATION
IN THE LAST THREE DECADES, but also that this approach has served
as a de facto invitation for the open borders lobby to get INCREASES
in LEGAL (and therefore ILLEGAL) immigration. Consider the growth
in legal immigration numbers via the 1986, 1990, and 1996 immigration
Acts.
On the other hand, if activists want to push for actual immigration
reduction, then we encourage them to ask for improvements in The
RIGHT Act, and support an immigration moratorium and its chief
advocates, CCN and its ASAP Coalition Allies.
That way grassroots activists know they will be supporting real
reductions in mass immigration and NOT merely mass immigration
management with an increase in numbers!
CCN supports The Right Act with an amendment for an all-inclusive
moratorium on all immigration in excess of 100,000 new entrants
(including LPRs and spouses and minor children of LPRs) annually.
Amnesty Threat Continues
We need your help to push for this moratorium and THUS keep up
the pressure against illegal alien amnesty bills now working their
way through Congress.
A REAL SHOCKER: We're facing a strong and well-funded opposition.
The Bush Administration is moving full speed ahead with a new
$50,000 to $250,000 per donor pro-amnesty "coalition"
of corporations and others who stand to profit from increased
immigration.
Companies such as WAL-MART who stand to profit from increased
immigration are being targeted by the Bush Administration for
membership in its pro-amnesty "coalition."
According to the Los Angeles Times:
"Corporations and advocacy groups with a direct interest
in immigration including those who need skilled high-tech workers,
farm laborers and university teaching assistants are being aggressively
targeted for membership. Those being courted include Microsoft
Corp., Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and groups representing academic institutions,
restaurants, hotels, landscaping firms, hospitals and
nurses." ("Immigration Rising on Bush's To-Do List,"
July 24, 2005 Los Angeles Times)
And the cost of membership in the coalition according to the
L.A. Times? We repeat: Between $50,000 and $250,000 EACH! Now
you understand the pressure for cheap, un-American labor and the
magnitude of our challenge!
Not only does pushing a moratorium give us an opportunity to greatly
reduce the very high legal numbers -- approximately one million
annually -- it also helps us resist the onslaught of illegal alien
amnesties AND increases pressure to pass good bills and stop bad
ones like the Social Security for Illegal Aliens Treaty now pending.
It is CRUCIAL that we all make a special effort NOW to increase
the momentum for a moratorium.
We can do it, but we need your generous support.
Together we can stop these amnesty attempts, and get reductions
in total immigration. But we're up against a powerful and well-funded
open-borders lobby, and we desperately need the support of concerned
citizens like you to help us continue to fight for the U.S.A.
We are asking that, if at all possible, you call our office (1-800-466-4866),
go to our Web site (www.carryingcapacity.org) or use the enclosed
business reply envelope to make a special tax-deductible donation
before the end of the year.
ACT NOW:
1) Contact your Representative and Senators and ask them to support
a moratorium on all immigration in excess of 100,000 per year,
and to oppose any amnesty or social security for illegal aliens.
This is essential to reducing illegal immigration (because it
reduces the "family magnet" and "safe harbor"
effects inter alia) and achieving population stabilization and
a sustainable USA.
The Honorable (Full Name) The Honorable (Full Name)
United States Senate House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515
You can reach your senators and representative by calling the
Congressional switchboard at (202) 224-3121. Fax and E-Mail contact
information for your legislators can be found at www.congress.org.
2) The chances of getting real reductions through Congress are
better than they have been in years. But to cope with the $50,000
to $250,000 donation range of the open borders lobby, we really
need you to dig down deep and give as much as you can NOW. Help
CCN intensify its presence on Capitol Hill. We need your Special
Donation today!
Please use the enclosed Business Reply Envelope or go to www.carryingcapacity.org
and click on "SUPPORT CCN" at the top of the page to
send your donation today!
And you can really help us increase our reductionist clout by
giving gift memberships to CCN: more members mean more money for
lobbying on the Hill, more money for advocacy, and more support
for our side.
P.O. Box 18221, Washington, D.C. 20036 05Act6
Phone: (202) 296-4548 Fax: 202-296-4609 E-mail: info@carryingcapacity.org
http://www.carryingcapacity.org
Pennsylvania Residents: The official registration and financial
information of Carrying Capacity Network, Inc. may be obtained
from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling toll free
within Pennsylvania, 1-800-732-0999. Registration does not imply
endorsement.
Tell your friends about this page!
Note: CCN is anti-mass immigration
but NOT anti-immigrant.
Home
| About CCN | Support
CCN | Publications
| Action Alert | Links
|